If there are images in this attachment, they will not be displayed.  Download the original attachment
Page 1
An Opinion Piece by Mark Kenyon and Daniel Wright
Los Angeles is about to witness the reckless brinkmanship of the
Autry Board of Directors and its management. Autry will play
political hardball in its effort to extract from our City govern-
ment the permits it needs to literally destroy the institution of the
Southwest Museum, the first museum in the city. If allowed to
carry out its plan, there is little doubt that the Southwest’s col-
lection will be “absorbed” into the Autry and in short order the
separate identity and independence of the Southwest Museum
institution, will vanish.
Preservation of separate identity of the Southwest was a core
promise of the Merger Agreement that could have been imple-
mented by either Autry continuing to use the Southwest Museum
site, which was found to be feasible by Autry’s own experts, and/
or constructing a separately identified Southwest Museum build-
ing next to the Autry Museum. Autry refuses to do either of these
things choosing to seek permits to construct one massive build-
ing so that the separate existence and identity of the Southwest
will be morphed into the “Autry National Center” brand name.
Ever since Autry ignited a community and political fire storm over
its failure to abide by its Merger Agreement promises made to the
former Southwest Museum Board, Autry’s management, under
the supervision of CEO John Gray, has assembled a team of slick
public relations, EIR consultants, architects, and corporate/lob-
byist attorneys to help override the overwhelming public outcry
against its misconduct. If the incredible “press conference”
conducted in September 2007 by Mr. Gray, Mayor Antonio Vil-
laraigosa, Councilmember Jose Huizar, and certain members of
the Board of the Mount Washington Association is any measure,
the dirty politics of Autry may exceed the actions of Home Depot
in its recent strong-armed efforts to avoid environmental review
of its Sunland-Tujunga store at City Hall. Home Depot’s highly
politicized effort failed because the community protested loudly
and the Councilmember for the area, Wendy Greuel, stood up
for her community.
In the City’s public input process conducted in 2006, only
16 letters out of hundreds of personal letters and thousands of
postcards and petitions supported Autry’s “plan” to remove the
Southwest’s collection from its own Mt. Washington campus
and convert the building to an “education and cultural center.”
When confronted with this fact by the press, Autry CEO John
Gray’s quoted reply was: “I think we have enough support.”
Perhaps Gray was not thinking about his lack of any credible pub-
lic support but the kind of support that only lots of money can
buy: City Hall lawyer-lobbyists, public relations mavens, a few
Native American supporters with existing financial relationships
with Autry, an EIR consultant willing to write documents that
skirt the true impacts of its project, and an architect now denying
the essential truth of her own professional report that the South-
west Museum can be reused.
Or perhaps Mr. Gray was thinking of purchased “support” at
City Hall. Will our Mayor and Councilmembers Huizar and
LaBonge be convinced to ignore the demands of their own
constituents, friends, and neighbors in exchange for campaign
contributions from Autry Board members and supporters? The
contributions are there in black and white on the
MuseuM Rushes for PeRMits
in GRiffith PaRk
Community Rings the Alarm on
Autry’s Breaches of Fiduciary Duties and Political Gaming of the City
—continued
Los Angeles residents, Native Americans and others,
protest the Autry’s conversion of the Southwest Museum
into merely a warehouse of the Southwest’s collection.

Page 2
City Ethics Commission’s website. And we think other
promises have been made to support future political
ambitions of some elected officials.
To save the Southwest Museum institution from cer-
tain destruction at the hands of the Autry, Los Angeles
needs to know who is a paid shill for the Autry:
S
ugerman
C
ommuniCationS
g
roup
This public relations firm is headed by Steve Suger-
man, a former communications aide to Mayor Richard
Riordan. Mr. Sugerman therefore once worked with
Robin Kramer, Riordan’s former Chief of Staff. Ms.
Kramer is now the Chief of Staff to Mayor Villarai-
gosa. Public information suggests Mr. Sugerman was
put on the Autry payroll as a consultant in early 2005.
Sugerman’s most notorious claim to fame was he pled
guilty to three counts of federal wire fraud as part of
the Fleishman-Hillard overbilling scandal at the Wa-
ter and Power Department. By pleading guilty to these felonies,
Sugerman avoided jail after testifying against his supervisors who
were sentenced to jail upon their convictions. Sugerman con-
fessed to knowingly submitting falsified invoices to DWP. His
employer later repaid $6 million to the City of Los Angeles, a
portion of which Sugerman was responsible for. For his coopera-
tion, Sugerman was sentenced last year to three years probation.
So, a confessed liar and convicted felon was hired by Autry as its
public relations and City Hall lobbyist. CEO John Gray likely
asked Mr. Sugerman to use his contacts at City Hall, the Los
Angeles Times and Daily News, and his “talents” to spin the de-
ferred maintenance problems of the Southwest Museum as mak-
ing the building unusable.
L
atham
& W
atkinS
This corporate lobbyist/law firm often represents some of the
most reviled real estate developers in Los Angeles. William Del-
vac and George Milsten was hired by Autry to assist it through
the environmental review and land use entitlement process at
City Hall. Milsten is known to be one of the most influential cam-
paign contribution bundlers at City Hall. Delvac, who once was
a darling of the Los Angeles Conservancy for leading the charge
to save St. Vibiana’s Cathedral from Roger Mahoney’s wrecking
ball, since joining Latham, has so undermined his historic pres-
ervation credentials as to be widely referred to as “the Darth Va-
der of Preservation.”
We believe Delvac was retained to figure out how to get Autry its
permits to expand in Griffith Park and sell at City Hall an argu-
ment that removing the collection from its historic building on
Mt. Washington will not impair its significance on the National
Register of Historic Places. Latham’s record shows it can be beat
in court: court of appeal recently overturned all of Playa Vista
permits due to faulty environmental documents and court of ap-
peal recently ruled Latham’s client violated the law by evicting
poor and elderly tenants of
the historic Lincoln Place
apartments. Latham’s con-
troversial
representation
resulted in political defeat at
City Council over the Sun-
land-Tujunga Home Depot
battle.
pCr C
orporation
PCR is an environmental
consulting firm that spe-
cializes in writing EIRs for
corporate developers. It was
PCR who wrote the Autry
EIR that claims the expansion
in Griffith Park has “nothing
to do” with the Arroyo Cam-
pus of the Southwest Museum. The EIR also denies that Autry
has any plan for the Southwest Museum’s future. These denials
are intended to avoid having to disclose the negative impacts on
the Southwest Museum. The Autry’s EIR, in our opinion, fails to
disclose negative impacts of the Griffith Expansion on the South-
west Museum and worsens Park traffic.
B
renda
L
evin
Ms. Levin is an accomplished historic preservation architect
who headed the team of experts that concluded in 2004 that the
Southwest Museum campus could be successfully rehabilitated
and returned to service as a museum. Levin’s team estimated the
cost to be about $22 million. Ms. Levin, a close friend of Autry
CEO John Gray, was later elevated to architect for the expansion
project in Griffith Park after Autry quietly fired its first architect,
Overland Partners. Since getting the contract to design the ex-
pansion in Griffith Park, Levin suddenly has been telling officials
and the public that it is not feasible to rehabilitate or reuse the
Southwest Museum as a museum. These new claims of Levin are
not supported by her own 2004 report.
C
onCLuSion
These key players will lead the effort at City Hall to obtain the
permits to expand in Griffith Park. Does John Gray have “enough
support” for his “plan” to remove the Southwest’s collection to
Griffith Park? Los Angeles will unnecessarily lose a huge piece
of its early history if John Gray’s support team overrules the po-
litical outcry. Will the Los Angeles community allow the Autry
to pillage the Southwest Museum’s collection? You can help
change this outcome by joining the thousands objecting to Autry
breaches of fiduciary duty owed the Southwest.
ContriBute
to the
LegaL ENFoRCEMENt Fund
and
Learn more
www.FriendsoftheSouthwestMuseum.com
Autry Sets Course for Destruction of Southwest Museum
continued from front
Will the Mayor and
Councilmembers Huizar
and LaBonge ignore
the demands of their
constituents, friends,
and supporters to hold
Autry to its promise
to keep the Southwest
Museum separate and
independent?