An Opinion Piece by Mark Kenyon and Daniel Wright
Los Angeles is about to witness the reckless brinkmanship of the
Autry Board of Directors and its management. Autry will play
political hardball in its effort to extract from our City govern-
ment the permits it needs to literally destroy the institution of the
Southwest Museum, the first museum in the city. If allowed to
carry out its plan, there is little doubt that the Southwest’s col-
lection will be “absorbed” into the Autry and in short order the
separate identity and independence of the Southwest Museum
institution, will vanish.
Preservation of separate identity of the Southwest was a core
promise of the Merger Agreement that could have been imple-
mented by either Autry continuing to use the Southwest Museum
site, which was found to be feasible by Autry’s own experts, and/
or constructing a separately identified Southwest Museum build-
ing next to the Autry Museum. Autry refuses to do either of these
things choosing to seek permits to construct one massive build-
ing so that the separate existence and identity of the Southwest
will be morphed into the “Autry National Center” brand name.
Ever since Autry ignited a community and political fire storm over
its failure to abide by its Merger Agreement promises made to the
former Southwest Museum Board, Autry’s management, under
the supervision of CEO John Gray, has assembled a team of slick
public relations, EIR consultants, architects, and corporate/lob-
byist attorneys to help override the overwhelming public outcry
against its misconduct. If the incredible “press conference”
conducted in September 2007 by Mr. Gray, Mayor Antonio Vil-
laraigosa, Councilmember Jose Huizar, and certain members of
the Board of the Mount Washington Association is any measure,
the dirty politics of Autry may exceed the actions of Home Depot
in its recent strong-armed efforts to avoid environmental review
of its Sunland-Tujunga store at City Hall. Home Depot’s highly
politicized effort failed because the community protested loudly
and the Councilmember for the area, Wendy Greuel, stood up
for her community.
In the City’s public input process conducted in 2006, only
16 letters out of hundreds of personal letters and thousands of
postcards and petitions supported Autry’s “plan” to remove the
Southwest’s collection from its own Mt. Washington campus
and convert the building to an “education and cultural center.”
When confronted with this fact by the press, Autry CEO John
Gray’s quoted reply was: “I think we have enough support.”
Perhaps Gray was not thinking about his lack of any credible pub-
lic support but the kind of support that only lots of money can
buy: City Hall lawyer-lobbyists, public relations mavens, a few
Native American supporters with existing financial relationships
with Autry, an EIR consultant willing to write documents that
skirt the true impacts of its project, and an architect now denying
the essential truth of her own professional report that the South-
west Museum can be reused.
Or perhaps Mr. Gray was thinking of purchased “support” at
City Hall. Will our Mayor and Councilmembers Huizar and
LaBonge be convinced to ignore the demands of their own
constituents, friends, and neighbors in exchange for campaign
contributions from Autry Board members and supporters? The
contributions are there in black and white on the