CityBeat, June 22,
2006:
Southwest
Squabble
A
battle is raging over what exactly will become of the
significant collection from L.A.’s first true museum...
Cowboys and Indians
Gene Autry vs. Southwest Museum: Piracy or preservation?
by ROBERT GREENE
It was one of those seemingly endless Los Angeles
school-board meetings, even more contentious than usual because the
elected officials were bickering over whether to put a huge construction
bond on the November 8 ballot. A representative of the PTA came to the
microphone to say the bond should move forward. And then the parent
did something most unexpected. He pulled out a petition with a drawing
of a pirate on it — and pleaded with the board to save, of all
things, the Southwest Museum. “We really need your help on this,”
he told the board members, some of whom nodded gravely.
Meanwhile, along
Marmion Way, one of the main freeway bypasses between the woodsy Mount
Washington homes of elected officials and their downtown offices, a
poster appeared with a drawing of a pirate and a warning that the historic
Southwest Museum is being plundered. “Come to the meeting!”
it said, but the poster disappeared well before the meeting day.
Just this week,
at a City Council candidates’ debate a stone’s throw from
the Spanish Colonial–style museum tower just northwest of the
Pasadena Freeway, a room packed with voters yawned at promises of leadership
and boasts of experience and accomplishments but cheered wildly at the
two would-be councilmen’s vows to stand up for the Southwest.
“There’s this perception that only downtown Los Angeles
can have museums,” complained José Huizar,
who promised to block the institution’s operators — the
Autry National Center — from moving a century’s accumulation
of Native American baskets, arrowheads, kachinas (and, it must be admitted,
human bones) from the leaky, bug-ridden Mount Washington tower to the
modern and airy Autry facility in Griffith Park, or any new annex that
might be constructed there.“I
join [City Councilman] Ed Reyes in saying that this
is cultural piracy!” Huizar added.
His chief rival,
Nick Pacheco, was no less adamant, noting that back
when he was on the City Council, he authored two motions to protect
the museum. How is it, he asked, that, in the two years since he left
the council, nothing further has been done? “The one who swings
the biggest bat on this issue is the mayor,” Pacheco said, invoking
the name of Mount Washington resident Antonio Villaraigosa —
and pressing the mayor to take the lead.
The Southwest
Museum? Cultural piracy? The words have become fixtures on Northeast
L.A. blogs and listserves, in neighborhood-council meetings, and in
the recent wave of art galleries and coffeehouses that have sprung up
in this historic and newly trendy part of town. And, apparently, downtown
in school-board meetings. Elsewhere in L.A., the Southwest has yet to
re-emerge in public discussion, five years after the fate of the venerable
but dowdy institution’s future was supposedly put to rest by the
merger with the Autry.
But get ready.
Absent some mediation from cooler heads, the angry and provocative charges
bandied about at the time of the merger — that the cowboys (the
Autry) are once again ripping off the Indians (the Southwest) —
are poised to go citywide.
And this
time they could get louder, in part because the political nexus of Los
Angeles has shifted to this part of town, until recently a backwater,
but now the home of some of the city’s most powerful figures.
Like Villaraigosa.
Administrators
of the now-vacant City Council office that Villaraigosa once filled,
and that Huizar, Pacheco and others are trying to win, have slated an
August 25 closed-door meeting to defuse the situation. But it will be
tough. Huizar is only one of several candidates and elected officials
who have promised to block any building permits for new Autry construction
in Griffith Park, where a display and storage facility for the Southwest
collection is to go.
In some ways,
it’s a battle for possession of the city’s cultural heritage.
For decades,
cultural Los Angeles has run east-west, from MOCA and the Music Center
to LACMA and the Getty. Museum-support dollars — and campaign
contributions — flowed downtown from the estates of Brentwood
and Beverly Hills. The blue bloods of Pasadena also sent their bucks
downtown and to the Miracle Mile and the Westside, but the historic
arts and cultural institutions of the Arroyo Seco languished.
Now, some
political and community leaders are arguing that cultural L.A. should
also run north-south, moving up from the Watts Towers and taking in
African-American landmarks like Central Avenue and the Dunbar Hotel,
and the museums of Exposition Park, into downtown, to take in not just
the Music Center but the new galleries and performance spaces. And then,
on the way to Pasadena, through the Arroyo, past the remarkable home
of Charles Lummis and the Victorian mansions of Heritage Square.
And, at its
fulcrum, in Mount Washington — the Southwest Museum.
Between the
lines of the argument come layers of ethnic politics and social complexity.
The high-culture pipeline from downtown to the Westside is tailor-made
for a car trip down Wilshire Boulevard or across the 10 and the 405.
A north-south axis, in the eyes of its proponents, embodies a Los Angeles
comfortable with public transit, since each of the icons on the north-south
route is walking or shuttle distance from a Blue Line or Gold Line stop.
The Southwest may not have much parking, but it’s got a Metro
station that was placed there expressly to support the museum. Plus,
the new axis arguably accords respect to blacks and Latinos, who have
long been left out of the city’s elite-culture circuit. “The
notion that the Southwest Museum is out of the way is shaped by an old,
pre–Gold Line view of Los Angeles,” argues Nicole
Possert, chair of the Coalition To Save the Southwest Museum.
Possert is
impatient with the Autry’s arguments that the Southwest’s
collection would be better preserved and displayed if moved to Griffith
Park, away from the home of Lummis — a near-legendary figure who
virtually invented the term “Southwest” as it refers to
the indigenous and Spanish and Mexican cultures of the area between
Los Angeles and Texas. “The cultural legacy of Los Angeles is
about to be lost,” Possert claims. “If the city does not
understand that our first museum is about to be replaced by something
six miles upstream for no reason, what are we saying about our history?
Our culture?”
Words like
that baffle John Gray, executive director of the Autry
National Center. Gray claims the Autry is saving the Southwest’s
collection from ruin, and reviving an institution that virtually no
one comes to visit. The Autry is rehabbing the building, protecting
and cataloging the collection, and trying to come up with a master plan
that puts the building to the best possible use and presents the priceless
collection of anthropological and cultural treasures to the greatest
number of appreciative people. So what’s the problem? “They’re
trying to hurt us, and they absolutely are,” Gray said of the
most vocal coalition members. “To force us to make a financial
commitment for a long-term permanent operating use of the Southwest
Museum here, which we don’t have the money to do.”
Charles
Lummis — newspaper editor, city librarian, civil rights
advocate, historic preservationist, civic booster — came to Los
Angeles from Ohio on foot in 1884. In a series of columns he wrote for
the Los Angeles Times, he described how he became captivated by the
indigenous cultures he encountered while walking through Utah, Arizona
and New Mexico. By the time he arrived in L.A., he had dreamed up what
was to become the Southwest Museum, housing his collections of Native
American and Spanish treasures and curiosities. But the building itself
didn’t open until 1914, and was already destitute on its first
day of operation.
Over the
post-Lummis years, generations of third- and fourth-grade schoolchildren
walked through the displays of baskets and mockups of various indigenous
nations’ living quarters.
But adults
rarely sought out the museum, and it foundered. One director actually
did commit cultural piracy, stealing and selling parts of the collection
in the 1990s. Without money to rehab the building or to adequately house
or display the collection, the museum’s board looked for suitors.
That’s
where the Autry Museum of Western Heritage came in. Without the Autry,
there’s a good chance that the collection would have been sold
or dispersed, or would simply have perished from the mold and insects
that plagued the building. The merger held forth the promise of saving
both the artifacts and the building.
But it also
left many people unhappy. The new institution founded by singing cowboy
and movie star Gene Autry got a sweet deal from the city — virtually
free land in Griffith Park, arguably in violation of the city charter.
And the displays emphasized the American pop-culture image of the West
— a 1950s cowboy-themed boy’s bedroom set, Gene Autry records,
John Wayne movie posters, Billy Crystal’s New York Mets cap from
City Slickers. The museum, renamed the Autry National Center, is currently
featuring the spaghetti Westerns of Sergio Leone. Let’s face it,
the place is a lot of fun. But the pop-culture emphasis (which is basically
the public sheen on some serious scholarship conducted at the center)
is a rather shocking counterpoint to the anthropological collections
at the Southwest.
After the
merger went through, Possert and other coalition leaders became alarmed
that a master plan for the Southwest Museum and the nearby Casa de Adobe
that they expected in 2003 still was not done. Then came the battle
of the reports, with the Autry citing figures suggesting that the Southwest
couldn’t draw enough visitors to support itself, and the coalition
responding with figures that said it could. Then came the lawyers, with
the Autry retaining legal powerhouse Latham & Watkins, and the coalition
responding with its own land-use attorney. Then the media fray, with
Times columnist Patt Morrison suggesting that the Southwest building
could make a great Museum of Los Angeles, and the local community paper
warning that the Southwest was being looted.
And the politicians
weighed in. Villaraigosa, while still on the council, told coalition
members that when he was elected mayor, he planned to “yank their
chain,” referring to the Autry. Councilman Ed Reyes, whose district
includes the Casa de Adobe, warned that he would not allow the “cultural
piracy” of the neighborhood.
That remark,
borrowed from the previous councilman, caught on and produced the poster
that called on residents to attend a July meeting. While the pirate
theme appealed to the coalition’s more militant members, others
saw it as an inflammatory barrier to constructive talks, and the poster
was quietly removed.
Villaraigosa’s
old council district is for now in the hands of caretaker Lisa
Sarno, who is convening the August 25 meeting. Her efforts
have been hailed by coalition leaders like Eliot Sekuler,
who said he is counting on city officials to block any new Griffith
Park building permit for the Autry unless the Southwest retains its
role as the home of at least part of the Native American collection
for which the museum is known. But Sarno’s promises are more measured
and may fall short of what coalition members are seeking. “We
are here to facilitate a dialogue between the Autry and the coalition
so that some portion of the Southwest will be able to be maintained
as a public space,” Sarno said.
If her efforts
fail, there is still the hope that Villaraigosa will step in. But given
the greeting that Autry curator Richard Moll received
at one recent coalition meeting, even the mayor will have his hands
full.
When Moll
described his efforts to rescue, preserve and catalog baskets and other
artifacts that sat unprotected at the Casa de Adobe, coalition members
accused him of looting. “You’re being an asshole!”
one resident shouted at Moll. “Shut up and leave,” another
said. So Moll left.
So far, though,
the Autry is staying. “There absolutely was a commitment and still
is a commitment to save this collection,” Gray says. “There
absolutely was a commitment and there is a commitment to save this building.”
But —
save the collection for at least partial display or storage in the building?
To that, Gray answers only that “The discussion from the very
first day was how do you generate enough support and revenue for a particular
use in this site, or in Griffith Park, to warrant raising the kind of
funds to rehabilitate this building. Or expand the Autry building.”